Why Is the Analog Output Performance On the USB DAQPad-6015/6016 Slower Than Expected?Hardware: Multifunction DAQ (MIO)>>Basic>>DAQPad-6015 for USB, Multifunction DAQ (MIO)>>Basic>>DAQPad-6016 for USB w/Screw Term
Problem: I am not able to achieve the analog output rates specified for the DAQPad-6015 or DAQPad-6016. What factors affect these specifications, and how can I improve my performance? Solution: The achievable analog output rates for the USB DAQPads are relatively slow compared to their PCI counterparts. This is a result of 3 factors.
Overall, you will be able to achieve a higher rate if you perform a software timed operation. While the update rate will not be as deterministic as a hardware timed operation, this lack of determinism helps make up for the slow communication. Attached to this KnowledgeBase are two VIs created in LabVIEW 7.1 that allows you to benchmark your update rate for both a hardware-timed and software-timed operation. When these VIs were run on a 3 GHz, Pentium 4 with 1 GB of RAM, the following values were measured: Benchmarks: Software-timed: 333 Samples/second Hardware-timed: 75 Samples/second Note: Benchmarks for both software-timed and hardware-timed operations are system dependent. Related Links: NI DAQPad-6015 (for USB): Product Page NI DAQPad-6016 (for USB): Product Page Attachments:
Report Date: 04/04/2005 Last Updated: 03/24/2006 Document ID: 3K3BITB9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
